[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15478493#comment-15478493
 ] 

Sai Teja Ranuva edited comment on HBASE-14070 at 9/9/16 11:13 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

The document(Current Status of HLC - google doc) contains the current status of 
the project with some details of the decisions made in the process. It also 
contains the work that is yet to be done. 
Open to comments.


was (Author: saitejar):
This document contains the current status of the project with some details of 
the decisions made in the process. It also contains the work that is yet to be 
done. 

> Hybrid Logical Clocks for HBase
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14070
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14070
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Sai Teja Ranuva
>         Attachments: HBASE-14070.master.001.patch, 
> HybridLogicalClocksforHBaseandPhoenix.docx, 
> HybridLogicalClocksforHBaseandPhoenix.pdf
>
>
> HBase and Phoenix uses systems physical clock (PT) to give timestamps to 
> events (read and writes). This works mostly when the system clock is strictly 
> monotonically increasing and there is no cross-dependency between servers 
> clocks. However we know that leap seconds, general clock skew and clock drift 
> are in fact real. 
> This jira proposes using Hybrid Logical Clocks (HLC) as an implementation of 
> hybrid physical clock + a logical clock. HLC is best of both worlds where it 
> keeps causality relationship similar to logical clocks, but still is 
> compatible with NTP based physical system clock. HLC can be represented in 
> 64bits. 
> A design document is attached and also can be found here: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LL2GAodiYi0waBz5ODGL4LDT4e_bXy8P9h6kWC05Bhw/edit#



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to