[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15480321#comment-15480321
 ] 

Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-16417:
---------------------------------------------

Hi again!

As I started to explain in my previous comment, we believe this JIRA should be 
split into two. I have opened HBASE-16608 for this case. In HBASE-16608 we want 
to present the merge of the immutable segments of the pipeline into one new 
segment, while this is done without data-copy-compaction and without SQM.

In this JIRA we plan to continue after HBASE-16608 and finalize the tuning of 
the in-memory flush policy for the best performance. All the performance issues 
are still meant to be resolved here. HBASE-16608 is for one more "algorithmic 
issue", not so sophisticated of course, but should resolve us the issues of two 
many segments (and later files) in the compaction pipeline. I would like to 
hear your opinion about all that! For more details look on HBASE-16608.

Waiting for your fruitful thoughts!
Thanks!

> In-Memory MemStore Policy for Flattening and Compactions
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16417
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
>            Assignee: Anastasia Braginsky
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to