[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15502128#comment-15502128
 ] 

Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16652:
------------------------------------

Though may not related to this jira, I'd like to mention that, we don't 
recommend customers to use append in production env. Since every append will 
end up with one get and one put, the ‘snowball effect’ caused by append will 
create big pressure on the cluster. 

> Figure out performance difference between increment and append
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16652
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16652
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Heng Chen
>              Labels: performance
>         Attachments: append.jfr, increment.jfr
>
>
> When do performance test in HBASE-16625,  i found it has the very big 
> difference between Append and Increment (append is about 37% faster than 
> increment).
> As [~stack] mentioned in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16610?focusedCommentId=15493166&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15493166,
>    append and increment has been unified in server-side,  and they looks the 
> same in client-side. 
> This issue is to figure out why the performance looks different between them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to