[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15547903#comment-15547903
]
ChiaPing Tsai edited comment on HBASE-16768 at 10/5/16 7:14 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
hi [~stack]
{noformat}
We have to iterate twice?
{noformat}
That is ugly code... i will fix it.
{noformat}
This is a branch-1 only issue?
{noformat}
master have this issue also.
Thanks for your review.
was (Author: chia7712):
hi [~stack]
{noformat}
We have to iterate twice?
{noformat}
That is ugly code... i will fix it.
{noformat}
This is a branch-1 only issue?
{noformat}
master have this issue also.
Thanks for you review.
> Inconsistent results from the Append/Increment
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16768
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16768
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBASE-16768.v0.patch
>
>
> If the Append/Increment skips the WAL, the sequential id will not be updated.
> It introduces that the AbstractMemStore#upsert may remove the cell even
> though the cell is visible to the oldest scanner.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
