[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15560484#comment-15560484
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-16795:
--------------------------------
[~misty]:
What do you think ?
> Revisit 'in project Maven repo' checked in as part of HBASE-14785
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16795
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>
> I did a naive update of docs on branch-1.1 from master like so:
> {noformat}
> $ git co master src
> ...
> {noformat}
> and the result failed a RAT check. Looking at rat.txt I noticed we are
> including binaries in our source tarball, checked in as part of HBASE-14785.
> {noformat}
> HBASE-14785 Addendum: Add an in-project Maven repo
> src/main/site/resources/css/site.css | 1 -
> .../maven-fluido-skin/1.5-HBASE/maven-fluido-skin-1.5-HBASE.jar | Bin 0 ->
> 344936 bytes
> .../maven-fluido-skin/1.5-HBASE/maven-fluido-skin-1.5-HBASE.pom | 718
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../maven/skins/maven-fluido-skin/maven-metadata-local.xml | 12 +
> 4 files changed, 730 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> {noformat}
> I'm not sure why RAT flagged this in that 1.1 build when I see that
> previously we have copied back docs from master into the branch. Perhaps
> previous copies have been more selective.
> This change has been committed for over a year. Let's make sure we have
> discussed this and determined it is appropriate.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
