[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15604192#comment-15604192
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16890:
------------------------------------------------

I just verified. So it does go to this piece of code
{code}
data.mark();
    checksums.mark();
    try {
      byte[] buf = new byte[bytesPerChecksum];
      while (data.remaining() > 0) {
        int n = Math.min(data.remaining(), bytesPerChecksum);
        data.get(buf, 0, n);
        summer.reset();
        summer.update(buf, 0, n);
        checksums.putInt((int)summer.getValue());
      }
    } finally {
      data.reset();
      checksums.reset();
    }
{code}
So may be I don't have the native library in my system. 

> Analyze the performance of AsyncWAL and fix the same
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: wal
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: contention.png, contention_defaultWAL.png
>
>
> Tests reveal that AsyncWAL under load in single node cluster performs slower 
> than the Default WAL. This task is to analyze and see if we could fix it.
> See some discussions in the tail of JIRA HBASE-15536.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to