[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15625817#comment-15625817
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16980:
----------------------------------------
Thanks for the analysis [~carp84], that's good work. Bisect is unreliable if
the problem is not 100% reproducible at every step, it could have been misled
at one of the steps. Your approach on making the test less flaky LGTM, let me
try the patch locally. Anyway, +1, and we should commit this wherever
appropriate, 1.2 and up I'd say, unless the test has been significantly changed.
> TestRowProcessorEndpoint failing consistently
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16980
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.4
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Yu Li
> Attachments: HBASE-16980.branch-1.2.patch,
> HBASE-16980.branch-1.2.patch
>
>
> Found while evaluating 1.2.4 RC1
> {noformat}
> TestRowProcessorEndpoint.testMultipleRows:246 expected:<3> but was:<2>
> TestRowProcessorEndpoint.testReadModifyWrite:184 expected:<101> but was:<91>
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
