[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15631060#comment-15631060
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-16994:
---------------------------------------
Thanks [~aoxiang]. HBASE-16721 is pushed to all 1.1+ branches. Close this as
duplicate if nothing more to do?
> Region report a last flushed sequence id that is less than the previous last
> flushed sequence id
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16994
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: binlijin
> Attachments: HBASE-16994_master_v1.patch, HBASE-16994_master_v2.patch
>
>
> Since append will be published to RingBuffer and handled asynchronously, it's
> possible that one append (say append-X) of the region handled by
> RingBufferEventHandler between startCacheFlush and getNextSequenceId, and
> reset FSHLog#oldestUnflushedStoreSequenceIds which we just cleared in
> #startCacheFlush. This might disturb ServerManager#flushedSequenceIdByRegion
> like shown below (assume region-A has two CF: cfA and cfB)
>
> 1. flush-A runs to startCacheFlush and it will flush both cfA and cfB,
> oldestUnflushedStoreSequenceIds of regionA got cleared
> 2. append-X on cfB handled by RingBufferEventHandler,
> oldestUnflushedStoreSequenceIds set to 10, for example
> 3. flush-A runs to getNextSequenceId and returned 11
> 4. ServerManager#flushedSequenceIdByRegion for regionA set to 11
> 5. flush-A finishes
> 6. flush-B starts and only flush cfA, getNextSequenceId returned 10, and
> flushedSeqId will return 9, and cause warning in ServerManager
> Since this append-X will also got flushed, we should clear the
> oldestUnflushedStoreSequenceIds again to make sure we won't disturb
> ServerManager#flushedSequenceIdByRegion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
