[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ChiaPing Tsai updated HBASE-17034:
----------------------------------
Description:
# HTable#exist apply the default consistency, but HTable#existAll dosen’t
# HTable#existAll may change the passed Gets , but HTable#exist dosen’t.
(HTable#get(Get, boolean) clones the passed Get)
So we have some issues outlined below.
# Can the passed Get be modified? If so, we can save the clone of Get. If not,
the HTable#getScanner() modify the passed Scan for some unset variables, so it
is ok to modify the passed Get I guess.
# Should we assign the default Consistency to the passed Get which has an null
value of Consistency?
This jira may be solved by
[HBASE-16623|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16623].
Any comment? Thanks.
was:
# HTable#exist apply the default consistency, but HTable#existAll dosen’t
# HTable#existAll may change the passed Gets , but HTable#exist dosen’t.
(HTable#get(Get, boolean) clones the passed Get)
So we have some issues outlined below.
# Can the passed Get be modified? If so, we can save the clone of Get. If not,
the HTable#getScanner() modify the passed Scan for some unset variables, so it
is ok to modify the passed Get I guess.
# Should we assign the default Consistency to the passed Get which has an null
value of Consistency?
# Should the HTable#exist be implemented by HTable#existAll? If so, it may be
duplicated to [HBASE-16623|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16623].
If not, it seems to me that we should unify all exist methods by AP. :)
Any comment? Thanks.
> HTable#exist and HTable#existAll are flaky
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17034
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
> Priority: Minor
>
> # HTable#exist apply the default consistency, but HTable#existAll dosen’t
> # HTable#existAll may change the passed Gets , but HTable#exist dosen’t.
> (HTable#get(Get, boolean) clones the passed Get)
> So we have some issues outlined below.
> # Can the passed Get be modified? If so, we can save the clone of Get. If
> not, the HTable#getScanner() modify the passed Scan for some unset variables,
> so it is ok to modify the passed Get I guess.
> # Should we assign the default Consistency to the passed Get which has an
> null value of Consistency?
> This jira may be solved by
> [HBASE-16623|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16623].
> Any comment? Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
