[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15646561#comment-15646561
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-17035:
------------------------------------------------
I am just seeing v2. Now it is accessed in a different way.
bq.The reason why I use a PriorityQueue here is because the sync with a higher
txid may come first as we do this in HRegion.put
Correct. I agree to use PriorityQueue. But just was checking cases where all it
could go wrong.
Even now there is no synchronization. So you expect the remove/add to work
correctly?
> Check why we roll a wal writer at 10MB when the configured roll size is 120M+
> with AsyncFSWAL
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17035
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17035
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: wal
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Found this when addressing HBASE-16890. It is one of the possible reason that
> why AsyncFSWAL performs worse than FSHLog when running PE tool.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890?focusedCommentId=15636688&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15636688
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
