[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15724220#comment-15724220
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-16700:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2080 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2080/])
HBASE-16700 Allow for coprocessor whitelisting (enis: rev 
c7b8b63cd1fc19e3be722ae6c71791d04ef48b9d)
* (add) 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/access/CoprocessorWhitelistMasterObserver.java
* (edit) src/main/asciidoc/_chapters/cp.adoc
* (add) 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/access/TestCoprocessorWhitelistMasterObserver.java


> Allow for coprocessor whitelisting
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16700
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16700
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Coprocessors
>            Reporter: Clay B.
>            Assignee: Clay B.
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: security
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16700.000.patch, HBASE-16700.001.patch, 
> HBASE-16700.002.patch, HBASE-16700.003.patch, HBASE-16700.004.patch, 
> HBASE-16700.005.patch, HBASE-16700.006.patch, HBASE-16700.007.patch, 
> HBASE-16700.008.patch
>
>
> Today one can turn off all non-system coprocessors with 
> {{hbase.coprocessor.user.enabled}} however, this disables very useful things 
> like Apache Phoenix's coprocessors. Some tenants of a multi-user HBase may 
> also need to run bespoke coprocessors. But as an operator I would not want 
> wanton coprocessor usage. Ideally, one could do one of two things:
> * Allow coprocessors defined in {{hbase-site.xml}} -- this can only be 
> administratively changed in most cases
> * Allow coprocessors from table descriptors but only if the coprocessor is 
> whitelisted



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to