[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15730776#comment-15730776
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-17277:
----------------------------------------
This means normally the alternate BM impl has to extend the existing one right?
This is marked private also. Do we need a entire new BM impl for the use
case mentioned here? Can we allow some sort of a callback impl or when the BM
tries and fails to flush the mutations in buffered? The impl of such a
callback can work with the spooling? We would allow some way to clear off the
buffer also then. Just random thoughts...
> Allow alternate BufferedMutator implementation
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17277
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17277
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Attachments: HBASE-17277.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-17277.master.002.patch
>
>
> Allow being able to supply alternate BufferedMutator implementation. For
> example, the parent issue would like to spool writes to the filesystem if
> hbase is down.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
