[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17174:
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Pushed to master.
Thanks [~chia7712] for the contribution. Thanks all for reviewing.
And [~chia7712], please add a simple release note for this feature? Thanks.
> Refactor the AsyncProcess, BufferedMutatorImpl, and HTable
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17174
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
> Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17174.v0.patch, HBASE-17174.v1.patch,
> HBASE-17174.v10.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch,
> HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v12.patch, HBASE-17174.v13.patch,
> HBASE-17174.v2.patch, HBASE-17174.v3.patch, HBASE-17174.v4.patch,
> HBASE-17174.v5.patch, HBASE-17174.v6.patch, HBASE-17174.v7.patch,
> HBASE-17174.v8.patch, HBASE-17174.v9.patch
>
>
> The following are reasons of refactoring.
> # A update-heavy application, for example, loader, creates many
> BufferedMutator for batch updates. But these BufferedMutators can’t share a
> large threadpool because the shutdown() method will be called when closing
> any BufferedMutator. This patch adds a flag into BufferedMutatorParams for
> preventing calling the shutdown() method in BufferedMutatorImpl#close
> # The AsyncProcess has the powerful traffic control, but the control is
> against the single table currently. We should allow alternate traffic control
> implementation for advanced user who want more control.
> All suggestions are welcome.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
