[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15780220#comment-15780220
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-17174:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2207 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2207/])
HBASE-17174 Addendum fix typo (zhangduo: rev 
5ffbd4a87d73caee3ab27ae8d6a47cd36afc859f)
* (edit) 
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/RequestController.java
* (edit) 
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/SimpleRequestController.java


> Refactor the AsyncProcess, BufferedMutatorImpl, and HTable
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17174
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17174.addendum.patch, HBASE-17174.v0.patch, 
> HBASE-17174.v1.patch, HBASE-17174.v10.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, 
> HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v11.patch, HBASE-17174.v12.patch, 
> HBASE-17174.v13.patch, HBASE-17174.v2.patch, HBASE-17174.v3.patch, 
> HBASE-17174.v4.patch, HBASE-17174.v5.patch, HBASE-17174.v6.patch, 
> HBASE-17174.v7.patch, HBASE-17174.v8.patch, HBASE-17174.v9.patch
>
>
> The following are reasons of refactoring.
> # A update-heavy application, for example, loader, creates many 
> BufferedMutator for batch updates. But these BufferedMutators can’t share a 
> large threadpool because the shutdown() method will be called when closing 
> any BufferedMutator. This patch adds a flag into BufferedMutatorParams for 
> preventing calling the shutdown() method in BufferedMutatorImpl#close
> # The AsyncProcess has the powerful traffic control, but the control is 
> against the single table currently. We should allow alternate traffic control 
> implementation for advanced user who want more control.
> All suggestions are welcome.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to