[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15838427#comment-15838427
]
stack commented on HBASE-17527:
-------------------------------
bq. Wasn't sure if you were suggesting something global...
I wouldn't pay much attention to my suggestion [~elserj] (Your Admin
Interception is better). I only came here because:
# I see yet another instance of the 'few line fix' with no attempt at
generalization or deeper thinking beyond an immediate need. This 'few line fix'
phenomenon is a plague on hbase. It is job security in that we need to file a
JIRA to do the fix for ITBLL and then another for ITAcidGuarantees... and then
another issue to fix a mistaken difference between args in ITBLL and ITAG....
It is DBATJ (Death By A Thousand JIRAs). I expect better of hbase veterans.
# What I see is an issue seemingly pulled from 'thin air' (again!). Inmemory
compaction has a team working on it. This issue is opened with no involvement
(according to description, comments), etc., of the associated individuals nor
does it have a purpose/plan/objective attached. Its as though the developer had
an idle whim. I expect better accounting/community being done by hbase veterans.
> Allow IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table to be in memory compacted
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17527
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Attachments: 17527.v1.txt, 17527.v2.txt
>
>
> Currently IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table doesn't support specification of
> in memory compaction scheme.
> This JIRA is to add support for specifying different in memory compaction
> policies.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
