[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15854734#comment-15854734
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17187:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 10s {color} 
| {color:red} HBASE-17187 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/0.3.0/precommit-patchnames 
for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12851230/hbase-17187_v3.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-17187 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5598/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> DoNotRetryExceptions from coprocessors should bubble up to the application
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17187
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.1
>
>         Attachments: hbase-17187_v1.patch, hbase-17187_v2.patch, 
> hbase-17187_v3.patch
>
>
> In HBASE-16604, we fixed a case where scanner retries was causing the scan to 
> miss some data in case the scanner is left with a dirty state (like a 
> half-seeked KVHeap). 
> The patch introduced a minor compatibility issue, because now if a 
> coprocessor throws DNRIOE, we still retry the ClientScanner indefinitely. 
> The test {{ServerExceptionIT}} in Phoenix is failing because of this with 
> HBASE-16604. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to