[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15858984#comment-15858984
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16859:
------------------------------------------------

I will rebase this patch and go for commit later today.

> Use Bytebuffer pool for non java clients specifically for scans/gets
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16859
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16859
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16859_V1.patch, HBASE-16859_V2.patch, 
> HBASE-16859_V2.patch, HBASE-16859_V4.patch, HBASE-16859_V5.patch, 
> HBASE-16859_V6.patch
>
>
> In case of non java clients we still write the results and header into a on 
> demand  byte[]. This can be changed to use the BBPool (onheap or offheap 
> buffer?).
> But the basic problem is to identify if the response is for scans/gets. 
> - One easy way to do it is use the MethodDescriptor per Call and use the   
> name of the MethodDescriptor to identify it is a scan/get. But this will 
> pollute RpcServer by checking for scan/get type response.
> - Other way is always set the result to cellScanner but we know that 
> isClientCellBlockSupported is going to false for non PB clients. So ignore 
> the cellscanner and go ahead with the results in PB. But this is not clean
> - third one is that we already have a RpccallContext being passed to the RS. 
> In case of scan/gets/multiGets we already set a Rpccallback for shipped call. 
> So here on response we can check if the callback is not null and check for 
> isclientBlockSupported. In this case we can get the BB from the pool and 
> write the result and header to that BB. May be this looks clean?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to