[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15859439#comment-15859439
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-17599:
--------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2472 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2472/])
HBASE-17599 Use mayHaveMoreCellsInRow instead of isPartial (zhangduo: rev
712fe69e4da3ff291244bda55b6656ce3dc51f72)
* (edit) hbase-protocol-shaded/src/main/protobuf/Client.proto
* (edit) hbase-protocol/src/main/protobuf/Client.proto
* (edit)
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegion.java
* (edit)
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RSRpcServices.java
* (edit)
hbase-protocol-shaded/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/shaded/protobuf/generated/ClientProtos.java
* (edit)
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/shaded/protobuf/ProtobufUtil.java
* (edit)
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/ScannerContext.java
* (edit) hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/Result.java
* (edit)
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ConnectionUtils.java
* (edit)
hbase-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/generated/ClientProtos.java
* (edit)
hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/protobuf/ProtobufUtil.java
> Use mayHaveMoreCellsInRow instead of isPartial
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client, scan
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17599-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17599.patch,
> HBASE-17599-v1.patch, HBASE-17599-v2.patch, HBASE-17599-v3.patch
>
>
> For now if we set scan.allowPartial(true), the partial result returned will
> have the partial flag set to true. But for scan.setBatch(xx), the partial
> result returned may not be marked as partial.
> This is an Incompatible change, indeed. But I do not think it will introduce
> any issues as we just provide more informations to client. The old partial
> flag for batched scan is always false so I do not think anyone can make use
> of it.
> This is very important for the limited scan to support partial results from
> server. If we get a Result which partial flag is false then we know we get
> the whole row. Otherwise we need to fetch one more row to see if the row key
> is changed which causes the logic to be more complicated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
