[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15864260#comment-15864260
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15597:
-----------------------------------

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 9s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 4 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
8s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 58s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} scaladoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 
26s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 51s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} scalac {color} | {color:green} 0m 51s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
34m 4s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 or 3.0.0-alpha2. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} scaladoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 
34s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m 53s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-spark in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 44m 25s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.12.3 Server=1.12.3 Image:yetus/hbase:8d52d23 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12852394/HBASE-15597-V2.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-15597 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  scalac  scaladoc  unit  compile  |
| uname | Linux e17a09814c11 3.13.0-106-generic #153-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 6 
15:44:32 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build@2/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / 3fe5102 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5695/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-spark U: hbase-spark |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5695/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Clean up configuration keys used in hbase-spark module
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15597
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15597
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: spark
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Yi Liang
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15597-v1.patch, HBASE-15597-V2.patch
>
>
> This should be considered a blocker for backport to branch-1 since it will 
> impact our compatibility.
> The constants we expose in configuration should all start with "hbase". Since 
> our configurations keys for the spark integration all relate to that system, 
> the prefix for all configuration keys (excluding those cases where we need to 
> do something special due to restrictions in how properties are handled by 
> e.g. spark) should be "hbase.spark".
> Before publishing a public api labeled version of our spark integration we 
> should review all of our configuration keys to make sure they either conform 
> to the "hbase.spark" prefix or they have a comment documenting why they need 
> to be otherwise.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to