[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15868849#comment-15868849
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-17624:
-------------------------------

Let me open new issue [~toffer] since this is in and it has a bunch of stuff 
other than concurrency.  HBASE-17653. I'll go through the code as was and apply 
above and list inconsistency or if none, then doc. the concurrency expectation. 
Thanks. Will ping you when I have something for you to look at.

> Address late review of HBASE-6721, rsgroups feature
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17624
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17624
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rsgroup
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17624.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-17624.master.002.patch, HBASE-17624.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-17624.master.004.patch, HBASE-17624.master.005.patch, 
> HBASE-17624.master.006.patch, HBASE-17624.master.007.patch, 
> HBASE-17624.master.008.patch, HBASE-17624.master.009.patch, 
> HBASE-17624.master.010.patch
>
>
> An internal review by [~busbey] and [~appy] turned up a bunch of good 
> findings going over HBASE-6721. They found some really good stuff a guava 
> type is part of our public API and concurrency in a few core classes is 
> inconsistent.
> Patch coming.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to