[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15874187#comment-15874187
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-17662:
------------------------------------------------

Small comment
{code}
    for (Store store : stores) {            // update the stores that we are 
done replaying
889             ((HStore)store).stopReplayingFromWAL();
890           }
{code}
Should this be in a try finally block that encloses that 
{code}
if (ServerRegionReplicaUtil.shouldReplayRecoveredEdits(this)) {
{code}
I think rest looks good to me.

> Disable in-memory flush when eplaying from WAL
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17662
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17662
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Anastasia Braginsky
>         Attachments: HBASE-17662-V02.patch
>
>
> When replaying the edits from WAL, the region's updateLock is not taken, 
> because a single threaded action is assumed. However, the thread-safeness of 
> the in-memory flush of CompactingMemStore is based on taking the region's 
> updateLock. 
> The in-memory flush can be skipped in the replay time (anyway everything is 
> flushed to disk just after the replay). Therefore it is acceptable to just 
> skip the in-memory flush action while the updates come as part of replay from 
> WAL.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to