[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15900787#comment-15900787
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17747:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 7s {color} 
| {color:red} HBASE-17747 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/0.3.0/precommit-patchnames 
for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12856752/HBASE-17747.v2.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-17747 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6000/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Support both weak and soft object pool
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17747
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17747
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>         Attachments: HBASE-17747.patch, HBASE-17747.v2.patch
>
>
> During YCSB testing on embedded mode after HBASE-17744, we found that under 
> high read load GC is quite severe even with offheap L2 cache. After some 
> investigation, we found it's caused by using weak reference for 
> IdReadWriteLock. In embedded mode the read is so quick that the lock might 
> already get promoted to the old generation when the weak reference is 
> cleared, which causes dirty card table thus slowing YGC.
> So we proposed to use soft reference for this IdReadWriteLock used in cache, 
> which won't get cleared until JVM memory is not enough, and could resolve the 
> issue mentioned above. What's more, we propose to extend the WeakObjectPool 
> to be more generate to support both weak and soft reference.
> Note that this issue only emerges under embedded mode with DirectOperator, in 
> which case all costs on the wire is removed thus produces extremely high 
> workloads.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to