[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923587#comment-15923587
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17747:
-----------------------------------

{quote}
But with no harm?
{quote}
I do not think so. There is no 'shrink' operation for ConcurrentHashMap, so if 
you put 1M objects into the map and then remove 0.99M, the table size will 
still be more than 1M.

{quote}
No I haven't tested with G1, but I think if G1 cannot deal with soft reference 
well, it's some kind of bug in G1 rather than use error of soft reference.
{quote}
Give it a try.  We need to confirm that G1 can work well. And mind sharing your 
GC options?

Thanks.

> Support both weak and soft object pool
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17747
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17747
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17747.patch, HBASE-17747.v2.patch, 
> HBASE-17747.v3.patch
>
>
> During YCSB testing on embedded mode after HBASE-17744, we found that under 
> high read load GC is quite severe even with offheap L2 cache. After some 
> investigation, we found it's caused by using weak reference in 
> {{IdReadWriteLock}}. In embedded mode the read is so quick that the lock 
> might already get promoted to the old generation when the weak reference is 
> cleared, which causes dirty card table (old reference get removed and new 
> lock object set into {{referenceCache}}, see {{WeakObjectPool#get}}) thus 
> slowing YGC. In distributed mode there'll also be more lock object created 
> with weak reference than soft reference that slowing down the processing.
> So we proposed to use soft reference for this {{IdReadWriteLock}} used in 
> cache, which won't get cleared until JVM memory is not enough, and could 
> resolve the issue mentioned above. What's more, we propose to extend the 
> {{WeakObjectPool}} to be more generate to support both weak and soft 
> reference.
> Note that the GC issue only emerges under embedded mode with DirectOperator, 
> in which case all costs on the wire is removed thus produces extremely high 
> concurrency.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to