[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15937940#comment-15937940 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17595: ----------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s {color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 7s {color} | {color:red} HBASE-17595 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/0.3.0/precommit-patchnames for help. {color} | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12860098/HBASE-17595-addendum-branch-1.patch | | JIRA Issue | HBASE-17595 | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6205/console | | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0 http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > Add partial result support for small/limited scan > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-17595 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17595 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: asyncclient, Client, scan > Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.4.0 > Reporter: Duo Zhang > Assignee: Duo Zhang > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-17595-addendum-branch-1.patch, > HBASE-17595-addendum.patch, HBASE-17595-addendum-v1.patch, > HBASE-17595-addendum-v2.patch, HBASE-17595-addendum-v3.patch, > HBASE-17595-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17595.patch, HBASE-17595-v1.patch > > > The partial result support is marked as a 'TODO' when implementing > HBASE-17045. And when implementing HBASE-17508, we found that if we make > small scan share the same logic with general scan, the scan request other > than open scanner will not have the small flag so the server may return > partial result to the client and cause some strange behavior. It is solved by > modifying the logic at server side, but this means the 1.4.x client is not > safe to contact with earlier 1.x server. So we'd better address the problem > at client side. Marked as blocker as this issue should be finished before any > 2.x and 1.4.x releases. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)