[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15972675#comment-15972675
]
Abhishek Singh Chouhan commented on HBASE-17937:
------------------------------------------------
Thanks [~Apache9] [~tedyu]. Yep, Moving the update just after memstore insert
would be better. I'll put up a v2 with the changes and header.
> Memstore size becomes negative in case of expensive postPut/Delete
> Coprocessor call
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17937
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17937
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.1, 0.98.24
> Reporter: Abhishek Singh Chouhan
> Assignee: Abhishek Singh Chouhan
> Attachments: HBASE-17937.master.001.patch
>
>
> We ran into a situation where the memstore size became negative due to
> expensive postPut/Delete Coprocessor calls in doMiniBatchMutate. We update
> the memstore size in the finally block of doMiniBatchMutate, however a queued
> flush can be triggered during the coprocessor calls(if they are taking time
> eg. index updates) since we have released the locks and advanced mvcc at this
> point. The flush will turn the memstore size negative since the value
> subtracted is the actual value flushed from stores. The negative value
> impacts the future flushes amongst others that depend on memstore size.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
