[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15980929#comment-15980929
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-15583:
----------------------------------------
bq. I ran TestRemoteRestore and TestBackupMultipleDeletes with patch and they
passed.
Thanks. [~yuzhih...@gmail.com]
The others have passed locally. Any comment? [~stack] [~enis]
> Any HTableDescriptor we give out should be immutable
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15583
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15583
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Gabor Liptak
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15583.v0.patch, HBASE-15583.v1.patch,
> HBASE-15583.v2.patch, HBASE-15583.v3.patch, HBASE-15583.v4.patch,
> HBASE-15583.v5.patch, HBASE-15583.v6.patch
>
>
> From [~enis] in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15505:
> PS Should UnmodifyableHTableDescriptor be renamed to
> UnmodifiableHTableDescriptor?
> It should be named ImmutableHTableDescriptor to be consistent with
> collections naming. Let's do this as a subtask of the parent jira, not here.
> Thinking about it though, why would we return an Immutable HTD in
> HTable.getTableDescriptor() versus a mutable HTD in
> Admin.getTableDescriptor(). It does not make sense. Should we just get rid of
> the Immutable ones?
> We also have UnmodifyableHRegionInfo which is not used at the moment it
> seems.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
