[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15989596#comment-15989596
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-17975:
--------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2915 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2915/])
HBASE-17975 TokenUtil should throw remote exception rather than squash (busbey: 
rev ba12cdf1388a467a0bca5074c9b8b5c022962131)
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/token/TokenUtil.java


> TokenUtil.obtainToken squashes remote exceptions
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17975
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17975
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mapreduce, security
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-17975.0.patch
>
>
> In the changes to protobuf handling in HBASE-15638, our TokenUtil class went 
> from handling remote exception via a method that would throw IOException to 
> one that simply returned it. In doing so, we ended up ignoring the results.
> This causes the obtainToken method to start returning null where it would 
> have previously thrown an IOException. It also causes obtainTokenForJob to 
> still fail with an IOException, but instead of being the underlying remote 
> problem now it's a generic "I didn't get a user token for some reason."
> found via testing Pig with errors.
> {code}
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: No token returned for user 
> testu...@example.com
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.token.TokenUtil.obtainTokenForJob(TokenUtil.java:175)
>         at 
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.hbase.HBaseStorage.addHBaseDelegationToken(HBaseStorage.java:887)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to