[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994103#comment-15994103
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-15199:
--------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2939 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2939/])
HBASE-15199 Move jruby jar so only on runtime classpath for hbase-shell
(busbey: rev 083796d2e67cbfedf30053e826dbd6e0c0b2baec)
* (edit) bin/hbase.cmd
* (edit) bin/hbase
* (edit) hbase-assembly/src/main/assembly/hadoop-two-compat.xml
> Move jruby jar so only on hbase-shell module classpath; currently globally
> available
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15199
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15199
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: dependencies, jruby, shell
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Xiang Li
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: 15199.txt, HBASE-15199.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-15199.master.002.patch, HBASE-15199.master.003.patch
>
>
> A suggestion that came up out of internal issue (filed by Mr Jan Van Besien)
> was to move the scope of the jruby include down so it is only a dependency
> for the hbase-shell. jruby jar brings in a bunch of dependencies (joda time
> for example) which can clash with the includes of others. Our Sean suggests
> that could be good to shut down exploit possibilities if jruby was not
> globally available. Only downside I can think is that it may no longer be
> available to our bin/*rb scripts if we move the jar but perhaps these can be
> changed so they can find the ruby jar in new location.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
