[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16020588#comment-16020588
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-18085:
-------------------------------
bq. Can we use the return value of purgeLock.tryLock() passed to BlackHole or
so?
Sorry, don't quite catch you sir, mind clarify?
While writing the JMH case, I felt that using AtomicBoolean or volatile boolean
we're actually re-implementing the tryLock logic. And I won't be surprised if
JIT has any optimization for its native implementation (smile).
> Prevent parallel purge in ObjectPool
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18085
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18085
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yu Li
> Assignee: Yu Li
> Attachments: e89l05465.st3.jstack, HBASE-18085.patch
>
>
> Parallel purge in ObjectPool is meaningless and will cause contention issue
> since {{ReferenceQueue#poll}} has synchronization (source code shown below)
> {code}
> public Reference<? extends T> poll() {
> if (head == null)
> return null;
> synchronized (lock) {
> return reallyPoll();
> }
> }
> {code}
> We observed threads blocking on the purge method while using offheap bucket
> cache, and we could easily reproduce this by testing the 100% cache hit case
> in bucket cache with enough reading threads.
> We propose to add a purgeLock and use tryLock to avoid parallel purge.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
