[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16020631#comment-16020631
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-18066:
-------------------------------

bq. Yes, and I think , better to support getClosestRowBefore in master , 
otherwise request from branch-1.x hbase-client to master branch server will 
fail.

Interesting [~openinx]. Yeah, we removed the code already but for example, 
asynchbase does not current run against hbase2 because of the missing 
getClosestRowBefore (which messes up my being able to use opentsdb studying 
hbase2 in operation).

> Get with closest_row_before on "hbase:meta" can return empty Cell during 
> region merge/split
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18066
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hbase, regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
>         Environment: Linux (16.04.2), MacOS 10.11.6.
> Standalone and distributed HBase setup.
>            Reporter: Andrey Elenskiy
>            Assignee: Zheng Hu
>         Attachments: TestGetWithClosestRowBeforeWhenSplit.java
>
>
> During region split/merge there's a brief period of time where doing a "Get" 
> with "closest_row_before=true" on "hbase:meta" may return empty 
> "GetResponse.result.cell" field even though parent, splitA and splitB regions 
> are all in "hbase:meta". Both gohbase (https://github.com/tsuna/gohbase) and 
> AsyncHBase (https://github.com/OpenTSDB/asynchbase) interprets this as 
> "TableDoesNotExist", which is returned to the client.
> Here's a gist that reproduces this problem: 
> https://gist.github.com/Timoha/c7a236b768be9220e85e53e1ca53bf96. Note that 
> you have to use older HTable client (I used 1.2.4) as current versions ignore 
> `Get.setClosestRowBefore(bool)` option.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to