[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16027200#comment-16027200
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-18027:
---------------------------------------
Looks good. +1
> Replication should respect RPC size limits when batching edits
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18027
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18027
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Replication
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.1
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18027-branch-1.patch, HBASE-18027-branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-18027-branch-1.patch, HBASE-18027.patch, HBASE-18027.patch,
> HBASE-18027.patch, HBASE-18027.patch, HBASE-18027.patch, HBASE-18027.patch,
> HBASE-18027.patch
>
>
> In HBaseInterClusterReplicationEndpoint#replicate we try to replicate in
> batches. We create N lists. N is the minimum of configured replicator
> threads, number of 100-waledit batches, or number of current sinks. Every
> pending entry in the replication context is then placed in order by hash of
> encoded region name into one of these N lists. Each of the N lists is then
> sent all at once in one replication RPC. We do not test if the sum of data in
> each N list will exceed RPC size limits. This code presumes each individual
> edit is reasonably small. Not checking for aggregate size while assembling
> the lists into RPCs is an oversight and can lead to replication failure when
> that assumption is violated.
> We can fix this by generating as many replication RPC calls as we need to
> drain a list, keeping each RPC under limit, instead of assuming the whole
> list will fit in one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
