[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16064331#comment-16064331
]
Allan Yang commented on HBASE-18144:
------------------------------------
{quote}
User was able to try the 'sort' patch (HBASE-17924) and reports that the patch
was "....better than default 1.2.x but not as good as original 1.x.0..." and
that there a few 'weird' drop-offs in perf. Let me see if they'll try
sort+HBASE-18233
{quote}
Sorting may cost as we discussed above, using HBASE-18233 alone won't cause
perf issue.
> Forward-port the old exclusive row lock; there are scenarios where it
> performs better
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18144
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Increment
> Affects Versions: 1.2.5
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.2, 1.2.7
>
> Attachments: DisorderedBatchAndIncrementUT.patch,
> HBASE-18144.master.001.patch
>
>
> Description to follow.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
