[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068450#comment-16068450
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18294:
----------------------------------------
But the old way old heap size based decision was making the file even smaller.
Even if there is no compression or encoding... For the off heap based
memstores also the data size alone based region flush is better. As said, the
above jira changed this. I think the cur way is fine and more inline with user
expectation.
> Flush is based on data size instead of heap size
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Eshcar Hillel
> Assignee: Eshcar Hillel
>
> A region is flushed if its memory component exceed a threshold (default size
> is 128MB).
> A flush policy decides whether to flush a store by comparing the size of the
> store to another threshold (that can be configured with
> hbase.hregion.percolumnfamilyflush.size.lower.bound).
> Currently the implementation (in both cases) compares the data size
> (key-value only) to the threshold where it should compare the heap size
> (which includes index size, and metadata).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
