[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16073452#comment-16073452
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18295:
------------------------------------------------
I tried different ways but the INLCUDE_SEEK_NEXT_COL does not happen. Explicit
tracker case clearly we know if we are going to go to the next row or not. I
only doubt the filter based scan where if the filter says INLCUDE_NEXT_COL will
we have the same problem. [~chia7712] - Can you confirm once?
+1 on patch. Great and amazing catch.
> The result contains the cells across different rows
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18295
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18295
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.2, 2.0.0-alpha-2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18295.branch-1.3.v0.patch,
> HBASE-18295.branch-1.v0.patch, HBASE-18295.v0.patch, HBASE-18295.v1.patch
>
>
> From the [flaky
> dashboard|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBASE-Find-Flaky-Tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html]
> If we use the cell which won't be flushed into disk as the top cell to reopen
> the scanners, the new top cell will change. If the new top cell is in
> different row, the matcher will reset, and then matcher will accept the new
> top cell...
> The TestStore# testFlushBeforeCompletingScan reproduces the bug.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
