[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16073568#comment-16073568
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18002:
----------------------------------------
Can we do this? Because the File mode is persistent mode.
{code}
/**
* File IO engine is always able to support persistent storage for the cache
* @return true
*/
@Override
public boolean isPersistent() {
return true;
}
{code}
So if we delete the existing file, we have no meaning of persistent IOEngine
mode.
> Investigate why bucket cache filling up in file mode in an exisitng file is
> slower
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18002
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18002
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: BucketCache
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18002.patch
>
>
> This issue was observed when we recently did some tests with SSD based bucket
> cache. Similar thing was also reported by @stack and [~danielpol] while doing
> some of these bucket cache related testing.
> When we try to preload a bucket cache (in file mode) with a new file the
> bucket cache fills up quite faster and there not much 'failedBlockAdditions'.
> But when the same bucket cache is filled up with a preexisitng file ( that
> had already some entries filled up) this time it has more
> 'failedBlockAdditions' and the cache does not fill up faster. Investigate why
> this happens.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
