[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13181074#comment-13181074
 ] 

Alex Baranau commented on HBASE-2038:
-------------------------------------

Re comparing this solution to others:

ITHBase: you can find very good comparison in HBASE-2037 description
Lily: apart from different implementation base (Lily uses Lucene while IHBase 
currently not) IHBase is more like "internal" feature added HBase, not a 
separate/additional tool/system. I.e. provides in-house support for secondary 
indexing.
Culvert: haven't looked into the internals yet (definitely will), but it looks 
like this may be smth similar. Not sure

+1 for doing evaluating and learn from other's experience use-cases to make 
"native support" (IHBase-2) better.
                
> Coprocessors: Region level indexing
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2038
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2038
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: coprocessors
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Minor
>
> HBASE-2037 is a good candidate to be done as coprocessor. It also serve as a 
> good goalpost for coprocessor environment design -- there should be enough of 
> it so region level indexing can be reimplemented as a coprocessor without any 
> loss of functionality. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to