[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13181647#comment-13181647
]
Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5088:
-----------------------------------
{code}
+ private SoftValueSortedMap(SortedMap<K,SoftValue<K,V>> original, Object
sync) {
{code}
The new ctor is private. Meaning, sync would always be the same as original. I
wonder if introducing the sync field is necessary.
Can this:
{code}
+ synchronized(sync) {
{code}
be replaced by the following ?
{code}
+ synchronized(this.internalMap) {
{code}
> A concurrency issue on SoftValueSortedMap
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5088
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5088
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: client
> Affects Versions: 0.90.4, 0.94.0
> Reporter: Jieshan Bean
> Assignee: Jieshan Bean
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.92.0, 0.90.6
>
> Attachments: 5088-final.txt, 5088-syncObj.txt,
> 5088-useMapInterfaces.txt, 5088.generics.txt, HBase-5088-90.patch,
> HBase-5088-trunk.patch, HBase5088-90-replaceSoftValueSortedMap.patch,
> HBase5088-90-replaceTreeMap.patch, HBase5088-trunk-replaceTreeMap.patch,
> HBase5088Reproduce.java, PerformanceTestResults.png
>
>
> SoftValueSortedMap is backed by a TreeMap. All the methods in this class are
> synchronized. If we use this method to add/delete elements, it's ok.
> But in HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation, it use headMap to get a view
> from SoftValueSortedMap#internalMap. Once we operate
> on this view map(like add/delete) in other threads, a concurrency issue may
> occur.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
