[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182190#comment-13182190
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5121:
----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12509823/5121-suggest.txt
against trunk revision .
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
-1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated -151 warning
messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
-1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 79 new Findbugs (version
1.3.9) warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapred.TestTableMapReduce
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/700//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/700//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/700//console
This message is automatically generated.
> MajorCompaction may affect scan's correctness
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5121
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.90.4
> Reporter: chunhui shen
> Assignee: chunhui shen
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.94.0, 0.92.1, 0.90.6
>
> Attachments: 5121-suggest.txt, 5121-trunk-combined.txt, 5121.90,
> hbase-5121-testcase.patch, hbase-5121.patch, hbase-5121v2.patch
>
>
> In our test, there are two families' keyvalue for one row.
> But we could find a infrequent problem when doing scan's next if
> majorCompaction happens concurrently.
> In the client's two continuous doing scan.next():
> 1.First time, scan's next returns the result where family A is null.
> 2.Second time, scan's next returns the result where family B is null.
> The two next()'s result have the same row.
> If there are more families, I think the scenario will be more strange...
> We find the reason is that storescanner.peek() is changed after
> majorCompaction if there are delete type KeyValue.
> This change causes the PriorityQueue<KeyValueScanner> of RegionScanner's heap
> is not sure to be sorted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
