[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100752#comment-16100752
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-18374:
----------------------------------------
I'm not convinced we need the new deleteBatch metric, but I makes sense as a
nod to backwards compatibility, maintaining the old behavior, but under a
different name.
The other metrics look useful.
+1 from me
> RegionServer Metrics improvements
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18374
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18374
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Abhishek Singh Chouhan
> Assignee: Abhishek Singh Chouhan
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18374.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-18374.master.002.patch, HBASE-18374.master.003.patch
>
>
> At the RS level we have latency metrics for mutate/puts and deletes that are
> updated per batch (ie. at the end of entire batchop if it contains put/delete
> update the respective metric) in contrast with append/increment/get metrics
> that are updated per op. This is a bit ambiguous since the delete and put
> metrics are updated for multi row mutations that happen to contain a
> put/delete. We should rename the metric(eg. delete_batch)/add better
> description. Also we should add metrics for single delete client operations
> that come through RSRpcServer.mutate path. We should also add metrics for
> checkAndPut and checkAndDelete.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
