[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16119613#comment-16119613
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18532:
----------------------------------------
As u mentioned, for the 1st table of stats, we should use the correct metric
details. If we are using CachedBlocksByFile limited details it is a bug. In
UI is it like we 1st list the 100K blocks and then can be paginated to
remaining? Showing all in one step is surely not a good idea and which may eat
up time also.
> Improve cache related stats rendered on RS UI
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18532
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: regionserver, UI
> Affects Versions: 1.1.2
> Reporter: Biju Nair
> Attachments: COMBINED-STATS.PNG, L1-STATS.PNG, L2-STATS.PNG
>
>
> The stats currently rendered for L1 and L2 cache are incorrect. Refer to the
> attached screenshots of stats from a cluster showing the combined cache
> stats, L1 stats and L2 stats. For e.g. the combined stats shows 38 GB used
> for cache while if we sum size of L1 and L2 cache the value is way less. One
> way we can improve this is to use the same stats used to populate the
> combined stats to render the values of L1 & L2 cache. Also for usability we
> can remove the table with details with BucketCache buckets from the L2 cache
> stats since this is going to be long for any installation using L2 cache.
> This will help in understanding the cache usage better. Thoughts? If there
> are no concerns will submit a patch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
