[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Appy updated HBASE-18542:
-------------------------
Description:
Need tests to benchmark performance of Clock#now() and update() functions (for
all types of clocks).
If update() is too costly, we can do optimizations in
ExecuteProceduresRemoteCall#call(), HRegion#replayRecoveredEdits() and other
places where we call update() in loop. Instead, it might be faster to calculate
max timestamp in loop and call update() just once.
was:
Need tests to benchmark performance of Clock#now() and update() functions (for
all types of clocks).
If update() is too costly, we can do optimizations in
ExecuteProceduresRemoteCall#call() and other places where we call update() in
loop. Instead, it might be faster to calculate max timestamp in loop and call
update() just once.
> [HLC] Performance microbenchmarks
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18542
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Appy
>
> Need tests to benchmark performance of Clock#now() and update() functions
> (for all types of clocks).
> If update() is too costly, we can do optimizations in
> ExecuteProceduresRemoteCall#call(), HRegion#replayRecoveredEdits() and other
> places where we call update() in loop. Instead, it might be faster to
> calculate max timestamp in loop and call update() just once.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)