[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16142034#comment-16142034
]
Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18519:
----------------------------------------
bq. This issue has the totally wrong name.
Sorry, I forgot to update the title..:P
bq. when we have different Cell implementations – i.e. Cells that are other
than KVs – how would I swap the factory?
We can add a static method which accepts configuration to pick different
builder impl.
bq. Factory could have a default implementation?
I will move default impl in factory to another class
bq. What we thinking for ByteBufferCell type. Its internal I suppose. Don't
have to worry about it for a while?
I don't find use case that we set all cell's fields one by one for building a
ByteBufferCell, so i leave a TODO in ExtendedCellBuilder.
> Substitute IndividualBytesFieldCell for CellUtil.createCell
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18519
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18519
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18519.v0.patch, HBASE-18519.v1.patch,
> HBASE-18519.v2.patch
>
>
> The IndividualBytesFieldCell, which is introduced by HBASE-14882, carries the
> input arguments without copying. We can substitute IndividualBytesFieldCell
> for CellUtil.createCell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
