[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16168100#comment-16168100
]
stack commented on HBASE-18446:
-------------------------------
I added the comment ".... I think for most cases filtering on the final
RegionScanner is enough, and it is dangerous to create a custom store file
level scanner as our correctness highly depends on the complicated SQM which is
evaluated after fetching kvs from store file level scanner." from [~Apache9] to
the high-level on why CPs have to change in 2.0 in our 'hbase 2.0 book'. You
say it well Duo. We should change your 'i think' to an assertion by us -- but
first running it by the Phoenix crew....
> Mark StoreFileScanner/StoreFileReader as IA.LimitedPrivate(Phoenix)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18446
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Coprocessors
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18446.patch, HBASE-18446-v1.patch
>
>
> Do not see any reason why it is marked as IA.LimitedPrivate. It is not
> referenced in any CPs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
