[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-18853:
--------------------------
Description:
I didn't follow my own comment when I added hbase-thirdparty
hbase-shaded-protobuf to hbase-shaded-protocol as a dependency instead of
original protobuf. It meant that our jar had protobuf bundled up inside it.
Change is small, and I don't think we were actually using the non-shaded
protobuf anywhere, but if anyone was, it'd make for interesting issue to debug.
Let me see if it breaks anything...
(Found by our [~vickyuec] on internal deploy...)
was:
I didn't follow my own comment when I adde hbase-thirdparty
hbase-shaded-protobuf to hbase-shaded-protocol as a dependency instead of
protobuf so our jar had protobuf bundled up inside it.
Change is small but let me see if it breaks anything...
(Found by our Vikram on internal deploy...)
> hbase-protocol-shaded includes protobuf (since we moved to hbase-thirdparty)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18853
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18853
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: thirdparty
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
>
> I didn't follow my own comment when I added hbase-thirdparty
> hbase-shaded-protobuf to hbase-shaded-protocol as a dependency instead of
> original protobuf. It meant that our jar had protobuf bundled up inside it.
> Change is small, and I don't think we were actually using the non-shaded
> protobuf anywhere, but if anyone was, it'd make for interesting issue to
> debug. Let me see if it breaks anything...
> (Found by our [~vickyuec] on internal deploy...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
