[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186660#comment-13186660
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5203:
--------------------------------------
Filed HBASE-5205 for the Delete issue.
For this issue here I will change the Delete(KV) constructor that I added with
HBASE-4682 to a deleteKV(KeyValue) method (which is what I should have done in
HBASE-4682).
> Group atomic put/delete operation into a single WALEdit to handle region
> server failures.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5203
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5203
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: client, coprocessors, regionserver
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>
> HBASE-3584 does not not provide fully atomic operation in case of region
> server failures (see explanation there).
> What should happen is that either (1) all edits are applied via a single
> WALEdit, or (2) the WALEdits are applied in async mode and then sync'ed
> together.
> For #1 it is not clear whether it is advisable to manage multiple *different*
> operations (Put/Delete) via a single WAL edit. A quick check reveals that WAL
> replay on region startup would work, but that replication would need to be
> adapted. The refactoring needed would be non-trivial.
> #2 Might actually not work, as another operation could request sync'ing a
> later edit and hence flush these entries out as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
