[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16182307#comment-16182307
]
Anoop Sam John edited comment on HBASE-18442 at 9/27/17 10:08 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
MSLAB chunk pool, the initialCount by def is 0 right? Seems that is not been
considered in the patch. Normally the initial count will be much lesser than
he max possible chunks count? When it will really start making a perf diff?
(Multi threaded way). Do we expect that big size to be in use? I mean am not
fully sure whether we need this multi threaded fix fo rthe MSLAB chunk pool
was (Author: anoop.hbase):
MSLAB chunk pool, the initialCount
> Speed up Memstore chunk pool ByteBuffer allocations
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18442
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18442_1.patch, HBASE-18442_2.patch,
> HBASE-18442_3.patch, HBASE-18442_4.patch
>
>
> Like in HBASE-17738 we can speed up the allocation of memstore chunk pool's
> ByteBuffers. {code}
> 2017-07-24 17:51:09,726 INFO [regionserver/stobdtserver6/10.66.254.41:16020]
> regionserver.ChunkCreator: Allocating MemStoreChunkPool with chunk size 2 MB,
> max count 12288, initial count 12288
> 2017-07-24 17:51:19,642 INFO [regionserver/stobdtserver6/10.66.254.41:16020]
> regionserver.HRegionServer: Serving as stobdtserver6,16020,1500898858958,
> RpcServer on stobdtserver6/10.66.254.41:16020, sessionid=0x15d748a9ccc0002
> {code}
> Allocating 12288 buffers of 2MB size takes around 10 secs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
