[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16191498#comment-16191498
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18752:
------------------------------------------------
Nice patch. I got it now. So if we have max versions set to 2, then also we
don't have any issue right? Still the time range tracker will be able to mark
101 and 102 in this case correct?
> Recalculate the TimeRange in flushing snapshot to store file
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18752
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18752
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18752.v0.patch
>
>
> We drop superfluous cells in flushing, hence the TimeRange from snapshot is
> inaccurate for the storefile. We should recalculate the TimeRange for the
> storefile, but the side-effect is the extra cost - we need to extract the
> timestamp from cell (ByteBufferCell).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
