[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16214223#comment-16214223
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18846:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
11s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
45s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
58s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 6m
8s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
0s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 4m
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedjars {color} | {color:green} 5m
0s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building our shaded
downstream artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
49m 17s{color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 or 3.0.0-alpha4. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 98m 46s{color}
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}175m 25s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hbase.security.token.TestDelegationTokenWithEncryption |
| | hadoop.hbase.security.token.TestGenerateDelegationToken |
| | hadoop.hbase.TestInfoServers |
| | hadoop.hbase.master.TestGetInfoPort |
| | hadoop.hbase.client.TestAsyncClusterAdminApi |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hbase:cb5c477 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-18846 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12893444/HBASE-18846.master.005.patch
|
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs shadedjars
hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux 84c527a0c19e 3.13.0-119-generic #166-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 3
12:18:55 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build@2/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / 2ee8690 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_141 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC3 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9312/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9312/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9312/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Accommodate the hbase-indexer/lily/SEP consumer deploy-type
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18846
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18846
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18846.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-18846.master.002.patch, HBASE-18846.master.003.patch,
> HBASE-18846.master.004.patch, HBASE-18846.master.005.patch,
> IndexerConnection.java, hbase-site.xml, javadoc.txt
>
>
> This is a follow-on from HBASE-10504, Define a Replication Interface. There
> we defined a new, flexible replication endpoint for others to implement but
> it did little to help the case of the lily hbase-indexer. This issue takes up
> the case of the hbase-indexer.
> The hbase-indexer poses to hbase as a 'fake' peer cluster (For why
> hbase-indexer is implemented so, the advantage to having the indexing done in
> a separate process set that can be independently scaled, can participate in
> the same security realm, etc., see discussion in HBASE-10504). The
> hbase-indexer will start up a cut-down "RegionServer" processes that are just
> an instance of hbase RpcServer hosting an AdminProtos Service. They make
> themselves 'appear' to the Replication Source by hoisting up an ephemeral
> znode 'registering' as a RegionServer. The source cluster then streams
> WALEdits to the Admin Protos method:
> {code}
> public ReplicateWALEntryResponse replicateWALEntry(final RpcController
> controller,
> final ReplicateWALEntryRequest request) throws ServiceException {
> {code}
> The hbase-indexer relies on other hbase internals like Server so it can get a
> ZooKeeperWatcher instance and know the 'name' to use for this cut-down server.
> Thoughts on how to proceed include:
>
> * Better formalize its current digestion of hbase internals; make it so
> rpcserver is allowed to be used by others, etc. This would be hard to do
> given they use basics like Server, Protobuf serdes for WAL types, and
> AdminProtos Service. Any change in this wide API breaks (again)
> hbase-indexer. We have made a 'channel' for Coprocessor Endpoints so they
> continue to work though they use 'internal' types. They can use protos in
> hbase-protocol. hbase-protocol protos are in a limbo currently where they are
> sort-of 'public'; a TODO. Perhaps the hbase-indexer could do similar relying
> on the hbase-protocol (pb2.5) content and we could do something to reveal
> rpcserver and zk for hbase-indexer safe use.
> * Start an actual RegionServer only have it register the AdminProtos Service
> only -- not ClientProtos and the Service that does Master interaction, etc.
> [I checked, this is not as easy to do as I at first thought -- St.Ack] Then
> have the hbase-indexer implement an AdminCoprocessor to override the
> replicateWALEntry method (the Admin CP implementation may need work). This
> would narrow the hbase-indexer exposure to that of the Admin Coprocessor
> Interface
> * Over in HBASE-10504, [~enis] suggested "... if we want to provide
> isolation for the replication services in hbase, we can have a simple host as
> another daemon which hosts the ReplicationEndpoint implementation. RS's will
> use a built-in RE to send the edits to this layer, and the host will delegate
> it to the RE implementation. The flow would be something like: RS --> RE
> inside RS --> Host daemon for RE --> Actual RE implementation --> third party
> system..."
>
> Other crazy notions occur including the setup of an Admin Interface
> Coprocessor Endpoint. A new ReplicationEndpoint would feed the replication
> stream to the remote cluster via the CPEP registered channel.
> But time is short. Hopefully we can figure something that will work in 2.0
> timeframe w/o too much code movement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
