[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16216594#comment-16216594
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18994:
----------------------------------------
Again the naming consistency as pointed by Chia-Ping is not there?
hbase.hregion.compacting.memstore.type vs
hbase.systemtables.memstore.compacting.type
So we can have hbase.systemtables.compacting.memstore.type ?
> Decide if META/System tables should use Compacting Memstore or Default
> Memstore
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-18994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18994
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-3
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-18994.patch, HBASE-18994_1.patch,
> HBASE-18994_2.patch
>
>
> HBASE-18992 brought this topic. Currently META is also using Compacting
> Memstore. We should decide if system tables can go with Default memstore only.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
