[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16261955#comment-16261955
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
-------------------------------
bq, Yes, I thought this was the plan...
Its not default [1]. Filed HBASE-19323 "Make netty engine default in hbase2"
1.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#heading=h.hpbw1fac8ixd
> document the mysterious direct memory leak in hbase
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19320
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.2.6
> Reporter: huaxiang sun
> Assignee: huaxiang sun
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2017-11-21 at 4.43.36 PM.png, Screen Shot
> 2017-11-21 at 4.44.22 PM.png
>
>
> Recently we run into a direct memory leak case, which takes some time to
> trace and debug. Internally discussed with our [[email protected]], we
> thought we had some findings and want to share with the community.
> Basically, it is the issue described in
> http://www.evanjones.ca/java-bytebuffer-leak.html and it happened to one of
> our hbase clusters.
> Create the jira first and will fill in more details later.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
